Americas Quarterly Brazil English

Pessimism About Brazil Is Overblown (Americas Quarterly)

 

http://americasquarterly.org/content/pessimism-about-brazil-overblown

Brazil has experienced almost non-stop political and economic turbulence since 2013, but the past few weeks have been particularly rough. A recent truckers’ strike is expected to shave off between 0.3 and 1 percent of already fragile GDP growth; a lack of much-needed reforms and continued policy volatility (including a 180-degree shift on fuel subsidies) suggest that Brazil’s economy may soon flirt with recession again. And while the economic data is bad – several million Brazilians have moved back into poverty in recent years – the political scenario seems, at first glance, even more depressing.

The recent strikes, which led to product shortages for a few days around the country, hit a raw nerve for a population tired of politics-as-usual. They also revealed a worrying vulnerability to radical solutions, like voting for the far-right former military officer Jair Bolsonaro, or asking for the armed forces to step in and restore order. Bolsonaro is leading in polls ahead of Brazil’s October presidential elections not because voters agree with his policies, but because they have lost hope in more moderate, traditional candidates. In the same way, scattered calls for military intervention on social media and by some of the striking truckers are not a sign of a desire for actual military rule, but of the belief that multiparty democracy cannot address Brazil’s many challenges. Former President Fernando Henrique Cardoso recently said “revolutionary conditions” were building up and warned Brazilians not to embrace “false prophets and demagogues.” In his recent column, AQ Editor-in-Chief Brian Winter described Brazil as “scared and leaderless.

But while many current trends are indeed worrisome, and some parallels exist to pre-Chávez Venezuela or pre-Berlusconi Italy, the full-blown pessimism prevalent at most policy debates these days overlooks the many reasons to be optimistic about Brazil. Part of the reason is that unambiguous narratives are always tempting. A mere decade ago, Brazil offered a positive story that was so irresistible that few wanted to spoil the party and point out the country’s numerous problems: ill-conceived industrial policies, stubbornly rising levels of violence, the need for tax and pension reform, and endemic corruption. Fast-forward 10 years, and Brazil is seen as a basket case headed for disaster. Despair in recent weeks was so rampant that many people, even serious commentators, compared temporary shortages in Brazil to those in Venezuela – a comparison that was absurd, misleading and an affront to the unspeakable suffering of millions of Venezuelans.

It may not be a popular thing to say these days, but anybody who would return to Brazil after a decade-long absence would immediately notice progress on many fronts.

First of all, the Lava Jato investigation, while far from perfect, has upended centuries of impunity of the powerful and helped Brazilians learn about how corruption is the life-blood of “presidential coalitionism,” which forces minority presidents to engage in unhealthy collusion with the legislature, providing patronage and public sector jobs to small parties hungry for booty. While voters are right to feel that such a system does not serve their interests, understanding the problem is the first step to fixing it. Without this broad comprehension that Brazil’s political system is flawed, there can be no meaningful reform to boost transparency and accountability. Anybody predicting such massive progress back in 2010 would have been seen as overly optimistic.

Though painful and temporarily destabilizing, these revelations provide citizens and policymakers with a better roadmap of how to fix Brazil’s structural problems. Due to peculiar electoral rules, legislators do not enact sensible policies because they are not accountable to their voters, but to special interests. The political elites still enjoy indefensible legal privileges, political campaigns are too expensive and government contracts still too opaque. Changing these four conditions would transform the political process and facilitate a debate about how to address the reasons for economic malaise – low productivity due to insufficient investment in education and infrastructure, an excessive bureaucracy, and harmful economic policies protecting well-organized interest groups.

Finally, Brazilian society, particularly younger generations, are now more politically engaged and aware than at any other point in history. That will ultimately strengthen democracy. Despite previous cases of graft, political protest used to be so rare in Brazil that, when… 

Read full article here.

Read more:

Brazil must urgently learn how to operate in a more China-centric world

São Paulo to Addis Ababa: A Revealing Journey (Americas Quarterly)

How Venezuela’s Implosion – and Reconstruction – Will Transform South America (Americas Quarterly)

Photo credit: Dado Galdieri/Bloomberg

SOBRE

Oliver Stuenkel

Oliver Della Costa Stuenkel é analista político, autor, palestrante e professor na Escola de Relações Internacionais da Fundação Getúlio Vargas (FGV) em São Paulo. Ele também é pesquisador no Carnegie Endowment em Washington DC e no Instituto de Política Pública Global (GPPi) ​​em Berlim, e colunista do Estadão e da revista Americas Quarterly. Sua pesquisa concentra-se na geopolítica, nas potências emergentes, na política latino-americana e no papel do Brasil no mundo. Ele é o autor de vários livros sobre política internacional, como The BRICS and the Future of Global Order (Lexington) e Post-Western World: How emerging powers are remaking world order (Polity). Ele atualmente escreve um livro sobre a competição tecnológica entre a China e os Estados Unidos.

LIVRO: O MUNDO PÓS-OCIDENTAL

O Mundo Pós-Ocidental
Agora disponível na Amazon e na Zahar.

COLUNAS